Should All-Star Game appearances be a big factor in voting for the Hall of Fame? - star rigging diagrams
I do not think that if someone is really worth. Of course, playing, a guy who deserves it and play 15 or 20 ASGS is great.
But to say that I am a very good ball player in a large number of bad associations. Every club needs to have a player of the ASG, so I get one in spirit, I say more # 6 in my league, in my usual position, but if I stop ASG is 15 games. Some years pass and people start saying that I should be in the Hall of Fame.
Could be (And of course, a good player on a team that was very much that my manager will decide in the next year. Or am very popular with the fans than a manifesto ala AJ Pierzinski (sp?) A Chicago a few years before.)
In other words, I would say that the Secretary-General, many bad decisions in the case of an accumulation of these are an important factor to make room?
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Star Rigging Diagrams Should All-Star Game Appearances Be A Big Factor In Voting For The Hall Of Fame?
13 comments:
No, it should be a factor, but is expected to correlate.
As a rule, the player must HOF perennial All-Stars. All-Star selection tend to the popularity of the fan, but the popularity of the fan is probably the popularity of sports journalists in the vicinity and who are both voting room.
No, it should be a factor, but is expected to correlate.
As a rule, the player must HOF perennial All-Stars. All-Star selection tend to the popularity of the fan, but the popularity of the fan is probably the popularity of sports journalists in the vicinity and who are both voting room.
It would be virtually impossible for a player to have more than 10 games only because he was on bad teams or good teams as you think.
.
No, I think they are insigificant.
I do think the nature of the questioner. We need to question the system of these awards, they do not give the benefit of the doubt.
All-Star Game should be considered safe. But it must be analyzed on the 57th, what will be. An example might be that some people with a justification ASG Bert Blyleven is not in the room. But the man was the highest ever defined with the eyelash meeting and one curve that their generation. Quite simply, because he selected not wrong for both teams does not mean that the error may have to be assembled when you look back at his career. The voters should not fix their mistakes continue with them.
People see through it. The baseball media knows much more about the game and the story of what we recognize properly. Fans of the game will also be mentioned that the player is not as good as his All-Star's proposed level.
People see through it. The baseball media knows much more about the game and the story of what we recognize properly. Fans of the game will also be mentioned that the player is not as good as his All-Star's proposed level.
I would say that in the past when they had the integrity to select the All-Star list should be in the equation. I believe it is now difficult to say that if Mike Sweeney in the Hall of Fame is because he played on a bad team, and Royal is the only option for some years. Is also in the selection of fans of the cutest boy in an All-Star deminishes the role of the All-Star player. That said, there are not many could say that about, when under the All Star Game 15 -- 20, no matter who played for ... That is amazing! All-Star vote should in any event, every year beginning at somebody does not deserve to be in the game.
Hello,
Checkout this website ...
You can all the details of ...
Ra
I think it means a lot, because when you are in the race for the player courtyard will be classified by their position at the same time as you. Even if Cal Ripken is the "Ironman" was a few years later, voted All-Star, and he should not have, and same goes for Willie Mays in the second of his career. The All-Star to me is the passing of the torch and the guard. While the better half is the 1st of the year, is rarely less well known, takes the player into the background "veterans a way that makes a difference, because if you an all star every year they are one of the best players in his position and his time.
Not at any time if a player shows in the stars of the team like AJ Pierzynski of the White Sox and Mark Redman Royals, as it is unfair. The vote is a fan popularity contest and there are many players who play much better market for computers that need in the All Star Game more than people who are really into it. I do not think it should come into play when HOF Star Game, because its meaning has been lost.
On the surface it seems to go hand in hand, but should not be a factor. Finally, it is a subjective vote, the locations of each player in a team of stars. You could say the same thing when it comes to the Hall of Fame.
Make-star team is just reward for a half-season in which a player, no more and no less. Final statistics to determine and administer the rule, whether a player the game or not.
No, there should be more emphasis on the all-star game that should decide the Hall of Fame, as it should be if it played to the advantage of being home to the World Series (which I do not agree with, but the another story). If someone is really a great player, but not great if they in groups or teams play fucking amazing. People know how good you are, whenever you play. And besides, the All-Star game is selected by the fans, not professional baseball. Fans do not always take note of players who are really great.
Post a Comment